ACCESS // OPEN

01MIND ARCHIVE // OPEN ACCESS

SPIN.OPEN.DOUBT.

One spin opens a file from psychology, philosophy, logic, or society. Read it with suspicion.

01204 case files02ES + EN034 fronts
02

IDEA ROTOR

CURATED RANDOM
FILE SELECTED: Values and Inductive Risk, 2 min.
FRONTS / 04

Fronts

LOCAL
ARCHIVE

00 / 204

Local archive

This browser remembers what you opened and saved.

0 / 204 opened
Nothing leaves this browser.

FILE SELECTED // FILE 00

Logic & science2 MINBrief fileDebated interpretation

Values and Inductive Risk

The cost of being wrong can affect how much evidence we demand before accepting a claim.

01 / SUMMARY

In short

The inductive-risk debate asks whether social or ethical values should influence scientific decisions when false positives and false negatives have different consequences. No single position is settled.

03 / SCENE

In the wild

A threshold for calling a substance safe may depend on the harm of wrongly accepting safety versus delaying its use.

04 / LIMIT

The limit

Acknowledging values does not license altering data or choosing conclusions for political convenience.

FINAL NOTE

What remains

Make error costs explicit and separate evidence, decisions, and values.