ACCESS // OPEN

01MIND ARCHIVE // OPEN ACCESS

SPIN.OPEN.DOUBT.

One spin opens a file from psychology, philosophy, logic, or society. Read it with suspicion.

01204 case files02ES + EN034 fronts
02

IDEA ROTOR

CURATED RANDOM
FILE SELECTED: Utilitarianism, 5 min.
FRONTS / 04

Fronts

LOCAL
ARCHIVE

00 / 204

Local archive

This browser remembers what you opened and saved.

0 / 204 opened
Nothing leaves this browser.

FILE SELECTED // FILE 00

Philosophy & ethics5 MINExtended dossierPhilosophical framework

Utilitarianism

Only one treatment dose remains. Should it go to the person in greatest need or where it creates the greatest total benefit?

01 / SUMMARY

In short

Utilitarianism is a family of consequentialist theories evaluating actions or policies by the value they produce, usually impartially and in aggregate. Versions differ over what counts as well-being and whether acts, rules, or institutions should be evaluated.

02 / SEQUENCE

What happens

  1. 01

    Identify everyone affected by a decision.

  2. 02

    Compare the relevant consequences of the alternatives.

  3. 03

    Give equal moral weight to equivalent benefits and harms, without arbitrary privilege.

03 / SCENE

In the wild

A health policy may be compared through years of life, suffering avoided, distribution, and side effects—not intention alone.

04 / LIMIT

The limit

It does not mean maximizing personal pleasure, and not every utilitarian accepts one identical formula.

FINAL NOTE

What remains

It forces attention toward consequences and excluded people, while raising hard problems about measurement, rights, and distribution.

CHECK / 01

Put it to work

01

How firm is your read?

Which question is distinctively utilitarian?