ACCESS // OPEN

01MIND ARCHIVE // OPEN ACCESS

SPIN.OPEN.DOUBT.

One spin opens a file from psychology, philosophy, logic, or society. Read it with suspicion.

01204 case files02ES + EN034 fronts
02

IDEA ROTOR

CURATED RANDOM
FILE SELECTED: Omission Bias, 2 min.
FRONTS / 04

Fronts

LOCAL
ARCHIVE

00 / 204

Local archive

This browser remembers what you opened and saved.

0 / 204 opened
Nothing leaves this browser.

FILE SELECTED // FILE 00

Mind & biases2 MINBrief fileContext-dependent

Omission Bias

Two decisions produce the same harm. One requires action; the other, standing still.

01 / SUMMARY

In short

In some comparisons, causing an outcome through action is judged worse than allowing it through omission. Perceived responsibility, prior norms, and intention change that asymmetry.

03 / SCENE

In the wild

A manager keeps a configuration known to be flawed because changing it and being wrong would feel more blameworthy.

04 / LIMIT

The limit

Acting and not acting are not always morally equivalent; duties, rights, and causation can distinguish them in relevant ways.

FINAL NOTE

What remains

Compare the consequences and obligations of both paths, explicitly including the cost of not intervening.

Source trail

Editorial review: 2026-08-06

Open another thread