ACCESS // OPEN

01MIND ARCHIVE // OPEN ACCESS

SPIN.OPEN.DOUBT.

One spin opens a file from psychology, philosophy, logic, or society. Read it with suspicion.

01204 case files02ES + EN034 fronts
02

IDEA ROTOR

CURATED RANDOM
FILE SELECTED: Choice Overload, 2 min.
FRONTS / 04

Fronts

LOCAL
ARCHIVE

00 / 204

Local archive

This browser remembers what you opened and saved.

0 / 204 opened
Nothing leaves this browser.

FILE SELECTED // FILE 00

Mind & biases2 MINBrief fileDebated interpretation

Choice Overload

Fifty alternatives promise freedom. When do they begin charging for it in effort?

01 / SUMMARY

In short

A large choice set can reduce motivation or satisfaction when comparison is difficult. Research does not find one uniform general effect: complexity, clear preferences, and expertise change the outcome.

03 / SCENE

In the wild

Choosing among thirty nearly identical funds may delay enrollment; a filter for time horizon and risk turns the catalog into a manageable decision.

04 / LIMIT

The limit

There is no magic number beyond which variety always harms; many people value having a broad selection.

FINAL NOTE

What remains

Reduce dimensions before options: set two or three criteria, then remove alternatives that fail them.