ACCESS // OPEN

01MIND ARCHIVE // OPEN ACCESS

SPIN.OPEN.DOUBT.

One spin opens a file from psychology, philosophy, logic, or society. Read it with suspicion.

01204 case files02ES + EN034 fronts
02

IDEA ROTOR

CURATED RANDOM
FILE SELECTED: Base-Rate Neglect, 2 min.
FRONTS / 04

Fronts

LOCAL
ARCHIVE

00 / 204

Local archive

This browser remembers what you opened and saved.

0 / 204 opened
Nothing leaves this browser.

FILE SELECTED // FILE 00

Mind & biases2 MINBrief fileEstablished evidence

Base-Rate Neglect

A description fits perfectly. How many people of that kind existed before you read it?

01 / SUMMARY

In short

When judging category membership, people may give too much weight to an individual detail and too little to prior prevalence. Specific evidence matters, but it must be combined with the starting frequency.

03 / SCENE

In the wild

A test returns positive for a rare condition. Without its false-positive rate and prevalence, “positive” does not mean “almost certain.”

04 / LIMIT

The limit

A base rate should not override genuinely strong, diagnostic individual evidence; both pieces belong in the judgment.

FINAL NOTE

What remains

Ask how common the outcome was first, then how far the new evidence should move that figure.

Source trail

Editorial review: 2026-08-06

Open another thread